Tags: Case, Legal Case, Supreme Court Of The United States Case, Unit Of Work.

Lockyer v. Andrade 538 U.S. 63 (2003) decided the same day as Ewing v. California held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under California’s three strikes law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments. Relying on the reasoning of Ewing and Harmelin v. Michigan 501 U.S.

Loading...

This page contains content from the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Lockyer v. Andrade"; that content is used under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the GFDL.