Zadvydas v. Davis 533 U.S. 678 (2001) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The court ruled that the indefinite detention of immigrants under order […]
List of articles in "Unit Of Work" category - Page 61
Rhode Island v. Innis
Rhode Island v. Innis 446 U.S. 291 (1980) is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that clarifies what constitutes interrogation for the purposes of Miranda warnings. Under Miranda […]
Edwards v. Arizona
Edwards v. Arizona 451 U.S 477 (1981) is a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that once a defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment right to counsel police must […]
Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures Inc.
Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures Inc. 327 U.S. 251 (1946) was a decision by the United States Supreme Court allowing an action to recover compensatory damages under the antitrust statutes. […]
Maryland v. Shatzer
Maryland v. Shatzer 559 U.S. 98 (2010) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that police may re-open questioning of a suspect who has asked […]
Coates v. Cincinnati
Coates v. Cincinnati 402 U.S. 611 (1971) is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a local city ordinance that made it a criminal offense […]
New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres
N.Y. State Bd. of Elections v. Lopez Torres was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that involved a constitutional challenge brought against New York State’s judicial election […]
Cook v. Gralike
Cook v. Gralike 531 U.S. 510 (2001) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an attempt by the state of Missouri to influence Congressional […]
Webb v. United States
Webb v. United States 249 U.S. 96 (1919) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that prescriptions of narcotics for maintenance treatment was not within […]
United States v. Behrman
United States v. Behrman 258 U.S. 280 (1922) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a violation of the Harrison Narcotics Act did not […]