Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus 210 U.S. 339 (1908) was a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the scope of rights accorded owners of a copyright. This was a case of […]
List of articles in "Unit Of Work" category - Page 251
Lochner v. New York
Lochner v. New York 198 U.S. 45 (1905) was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that held that liberty of contract was implicit in the Due Process Clause of […]
Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. 539 U.S. 23 (2003) was a copyright and trademark case of the Supreme Court of the United States involving the applicability of […]
Myers v. United States
Myers v. United States 272 U.S. 52 (1926) was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials and does […]
Mapp v. Ohio
Mapp v. Ohio 367 U.S. 643 (1961) was a landmark case in criminal procedure in which the United States Supreme Court decided that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth […]
Furman v. Georgia
Furman v. Georgia 408 U.S. 238 (1972) was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled on the requirement for a degree of consistency in the application of the death […]
Loving v. Virginia
Loving v. Virginia 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court which invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage. The case was brought by […]
Dent v. West Virginia
Dent v. West Virginia 129 U.S. 114 (1889) was an important United States Supreme Court case involving the reputable practice of physicians and state laws in the late 19th century.
Epperson v. Arkansas
Epperson v. Arkansas 393 U.S. 97 (1968) was a United States Supreme Court case that invalidated an Arkansas statute that prohibited the teaching of human evolution in the public schools.
United States v. Morrison
United States v. Morrison 529 U.S. 598 (2000) is a United States Supreme Court decision which held that parts of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 were unconstitutional because […]